WASHINGTON – The House overwhelmingly approved $ 1 billion in new funding for Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system on Thursday, after a debate that revealed bitter divisions among Democrats over U.S. policy toward the one of his closest allies.
The vote was 420: 9 to help Israel replace missile interceptors used in heavy fighting in a devastating rocket and missile war with the Palestinians in May, reflecting congressional bipartisan support for Jerusalem that has persisted for decades .
But the unbalanced vote came only after days of acrimony between progressives who accused Israel of human rights abuses and other lawmakers, including party leaders, who said they were dismayed and astonished by the refusal of their colleagues to finance a defense system to protect Israeli civilians.
Bitter complaints about the measure spread on the House floor on Thursday, as some progressive Democrats who opposed it called Israel an “apartheid state” and supporters launched accusations of anti-Semitism. At the end, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, a fierce critic of Israel who had come under scathing criticism from pro-Israel activists for refusing to support the measure, was in tears after saying changed his vote from “no” to “present”. “
The Back-and-forth was the latest outbreak in a long-simmering feud between a forceful new generation of progressive Democrats – including many people of color – who have demanded an end to unconditional aid to Israel and to d ‘other party members who argue that the United States must not waver in its support for Israel’s right to self-defense. Internal tensions arise as a growing number of Democrats in Washington, pushed by the party’s left flank, say they are no longer willing to give the country a pass for its treatment of Palestinians, a change that has disturbed senior Israeli officials.
Tensions have erupted at an inconvenient time for the party, as Democrats work to bridge internal divisions over domestic politics in order to save President Biden’s agenda.
The dispute began this week, after progressives revolted against including Iron Dome funding in an emergency spending bill, effectively threatening to shut down the government rather than backing the money. Democratic leaders were forced to withdraw it from the bill, which passed the House on Tuesday, and hold a separate vote to approve the Iron Dome money.
“I will not support an effort to allow war crimes and human rights abuses and violence,” Representative Rashida Tlaib, Democrat of Michigan, said Thursday. “We cannot speak only of the Israelis’ need for security at a time when Palestinians live under a violent apartheid system and are dying of what Human Rights Watch has called war crimes.
The Liberals ‘move shocked many other Democrats, who said their colleagues’ opposition to funding Israel’s defense was beyond pallor. They noted that at the height of the fighting in May, the Iron Dome intercepted more than 90 percent of the flurry of rockets launched by Hamas that would otherwise have landed in areas populated by civilians.
Understanding the Infrastructure Bill
- A trillion dollar package has passed. The Senate passed a vast bipartisan infrastructure package on August 10, closing weeks of intense negotiations and debate over the largest federal investment in the country’s aging public works system in more than a decade.
- The final vote. The final tally in the Senate was 69 for 30 against. The legislation, yet to be passed by the House, would affect nearly every facet of the U.S. economy and strengthen the nation’s response to global warming.
- Main areas of expenditure. Overall, the bipartite plan focuses spending on transport, utilities and pollution control.
- Transport. About $ 110 billion would go to roads, bridges and other transportation projects; $ 25 billion for airports; and $ 66 billion for railways, giving Amtrak the largest funding it has received since its inception in 1971.
- Utilities. Senators also included $ 65 billion to connect hard-to-reach rural communities to high-speed internet and help enroll low-income city dwellers who cannot afford it, and $ 8 billion for Western water infrastructure. .
- Depollution: About $ 21 billion would go to cleaning up abandoned wells and mines and Superfund sites.
In an angry speech, Representative Ted Deutch, Democrat of Florida, said he would not allow “a colleague of mine to speak in the House of Representatives and call the Jewish Democratic State of Israel a ‘Apartheid state’.
“Falsely characterizing the State of Israel is consistent with those who advocate the dismantling of the only Jewish state in the world,” he said. “When there isn’t room on the map for one Jewish state, that’s anti-Semitism, and I reject it. “
Despite the angst, only eight Democrats – along with one Republican, Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky – ultimately opposed the measure.
A few minutes before the close of the vote, Mrs. Ocasio-Cortez huddled in tears with her allies before passing her vote to “present”. The table underscored how heartbreaking the vote was, even for outspoken progressives, who were caught between their principles and pro-Israel voices still powerful in their party, such as lobbyists and influential rabbis. (A spokesperson for Ms Ocasio-Cortez declined to comment on her change in stance.)
Another Democrat, Georgia Rep. Hank Johnson, also voted in attendance.
Privately, some progressive lawmakers were furious with Rep. Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, Democrat No.2, who lobbied for the vote on Iron Dome funding after it was removed from the bill. broader spending this week.
His maneuver seemed intended to calm Israeli officials, who had watched with concern as the fight unfolded on Capitol Hill and closely followed the earlier efforts of young liberal lawmakers to halt US military aid to Israel.
Biden Budget 2022
Fiscal year 2022 for the federal government begins October 1, and President Biden has revealed what he would like to spend on that date. But any expenditure requires the approval of both houses of Congress. Here’s what the plan includes:
- Ambitious total expenditure: President Biden would like the federal government to spend $ 6 trillion in fiscal 2022 and total spending to reach $ 8.2 trillion by 2031. This would take the United States to its highest sustained levels of federal spending since World War II, while running deficits exceeding $ 1.3 trillion over the next decade.
- Infrastructure plan: The budget outlines the president’s first year of investment desired in his U.S. Jobs Plan, which aims to fund improvements to roads, bridges, public transportation and more with a total of $ 2.3 trillion dollars over eight years.
- Family package: The budget also addresses the other major spending proposal Biden has already rolled out, his U.S. Plan for Families, to strengthen the U.S. social safety net by expanding access to education, reducing costs. childcare and supporting women in the labor market.
- Compulsory programs: As usual, mandatory spending for programs like Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare is a significant portion of the proposed budget. They increase as the American population ages.
- Discretionary spending: Funding for the individual budgets of executive agencies and programs would reach approximately $ 1.5 trillion in 2022, an increase of 16% over the previous budget.
- How Biden would pay him: The president would largely fund his agenda by raising taxes on corporations and high incomes, which would begin to reduce budget deficits in the 2030s. Administration officials said the tax increases would fully offset the projects. jobs and families over 15 years, which the budget request supports. Until then, the budget deficit would remain above $ 1.3 trillion each year.
After Yair Lapid, the Israeli Foreign Minister, called Mr. Hoyer and stressed the need for the House to approve the request as soon as possible, the congressman assured him that the initial revolt of the progressives was nothing more than a “technical delay”, according to a report of the appeal released by the office of Mr. Lapid. Hours later, Hoyer announced that the House would vote to approve the funding later in the week.
Other leading Democrats, including President Nancy Pelosi of California and Representative Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, chair of the Credit Committee, rose Thursday to support the legislation. They argued that the passage of the additional funding was crucial to protect Israeli civilians and noted that it was an extension of a deal made by President Barack Obama in 2016.
“This bill demonstrates that the commitment of Congress to our friend and ally Israel is bipartisan and foolproof,” Ms. DeLauro said. “It responds to our moral imperative to protect the lives of innocent civilians and helps lay the foundation for peace. “
But progressive critics have spoken harsh words about Israel’s conduct and argued that strong support for the nation in Congress should end. Representative Ilhan Omar, Democrat from Minnesota, said the United States should no longer continue to provide funds to Israel “without addressing the underlying problem of the occupation.”
“It is not just one country,” she said. “If human rights are to truly guide our foreign policy, we must act like this everywhere. Otherwise, our words ring hollow.
Seeing an opportunity to remove Jewish voters from the Democratic Party, House Republicans called the altercation a transgression against Israel. They said the progressives’ refusal to pass funding under the broader spending bill was a missed opportunity to support Israel, even as Republicans en masse opposed the measure.
“By blocking funding to replenish the Iron Dome, Democrats have chosen to forgo an opportunity to stand with Israel and its citizens,” said Representative Steve Scalise of Louisiana, Republican No. ° 2.
Luke broadwater contributed reports.